About Me

Name: ValiantForTruth
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Age of Consent


Why is age of consent becoming a problem? There is no law against doing what is right. Why are more young people engaged in lawlessness?

Is this an indictment against modern sex education; or an indictment against the vain philosophy behind today’s sex education? By modern I mean sexuality void of morality, and by vain philosophy I mean naturalism.

We might say that naturalism is being used to teach young people a lawless and immoral behavior. Its fruits are not only sexual immorality and perversion at earlier ages but increased violence and hopelessness as pointed out by Mr. Rohrbough, father of slain Columbine student Daniel Rohrbough…

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/10/02/freespeech/main2057062.shtml

America’s public school youth as well as their parents have been robbed of the truth of who they are as image bearers of the Infinite and Personal I AM revealed in the person and work of Jesus Christ.

In past generations this knowledge provided a real remedy for the destructive behaviors associated with all the flavors of what has become known as self identity crisis. Without this knowledge the generations are left exposed and vulnerable to the destruction of vain philosophies.

To you who want to blame the parents. Do you not condemn the system by finding fault with its fruit? These parents you disparage are themselves products of the failed school system.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sin and Righteousness


The Cross of Christ and His Resurrection are the focal point of history. The Hebrew prophets foretold of His coming and the great work He would accomplish. The living God continues to invade history and fulfill the New Covenant promises by applying the work of redemption. In Messiah the types and shadows of the bloody sacrificial system are fulfilled, and the great question of sin and righteousness is answered.
 
Not only are our sins imputed to the sin bearer, but there is much more good news. The righteousness of the sinless sin bearer is imputed to the sinner. The doctrine of imputed sin is incomplete without the doctrine of imputed righteousness, because on it hangs the great doctrine of justification by faith alone. In Biblical Christianity righteousness is of grace through faith and not of works…

’For [God] made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.’ [2 Corinthians 5:21]
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The vain philosophy of Mr. Obama


“Look, I got two daughters — 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first about values and morals, but if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby. I don’t want them punished with an STD at age 16, so it doesn’t make sense to not give them information.” –Senator Obama
 
 
What kind of values and morals would consider a child to be a mistake and the care of it to be a punishment? What values and morals are learned when abortion is considered as a form of birth control? Our understanding of values and morals is skewed because we have lost the foundation on which life and liberty is built and exchanged it for death and tyranny for the weak.

What is the worth of life and how do we measure the quality of life? Let us compare God’s judgment with that of men.

What will a man give in exchange for his soul and what does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his own soul?’ These words of Christ give us an understanding of the infinite worth of the soul. There would be no abortion if men knew the truth of who they are as image bearers of the Infinite God.

He who is greatest among you will be your servant.’ Christ personified these words by defining what gives life its value. ‘I did not come to be served, but to serve and to give My life a ransom for many’.

Those who consume their life on pleasing self will lose it, but those who spend their life in serving others will find it.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Honoring our forefathers

 
Are those intolerant Puritans the ones who gave us a Constitutional government? Did they help free us from the tyranny of king and pope? Are they the same ones influenced by the Reformed Baptists who gave us the first amendment that guarantees religious liberty? Yes! They are the ones on whose labor we stand.

Our religious and political liberty has it origin in the Reformation and Reformed Theology. Modernism wants to deny it and disparage it, but this is the historical record that cannot be denied.

Many think that we have outgrown the beliefs of our forefathers, and many more are ignorant of their beliefs except that which is disparaging, but the Reformed Theology is what made the statesmen and the common man alike love his liberty and his integrity.

What would the Constitution look like today if it were written by the ‘tolerant liberals’? There would be no Constitution, nor a Bill of Rights. We would have a rule of tyranny by the elites. They have no concept of the sovereignty of God and government of a free people because they have no concept of the source of liberty.

For example, ‘in Christ the divine compassion showed heart-winning sympathy with the weak, but the modernist in this respect takes the opposite ground that the weak must be supplanted by the strong. Such they tell us, was the process of selection to which we, ourselves, owe our origin’ [Lectures on Calvinism by Kuyper, 1898].
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Unmerciful servants


What is it that unifies the Democratic Party? They have a coalition of special interest groups all wanting a powerful government to force their agenda. Compared to the thinking of early Americans is this not un-American at the core?

There are many examples of their intolerance and hypocrisy. That it exists is not the issue. What is the reason for the growing intolerance is the question of interest. Why are they so quick to point out the faults of others while blind to there own?

The modern liberal has a completely different world view than those who foundered and built this country. They are opposed to conservatism because the founding principles are anathema to them.

Our premise is that toleration must be learned from the experience of grace. In the parable of the unmerciful servant [Mathew 18:21-35], the servant was rebuked by his master when he refused to show mercy after mercy had been given to him, “Should you not also have had compassion on your fellow servant, just as I had pity on you?’

The men of this world have no concept of divine mercy therefore as they move farther away from the influence of our forefathers they demonstrate less and less the ability of tolerating differing views.

We who have been handed liberty and opportunity purchased by the sacrifice of others should above all men appreciate those who went before us and recognize that their world view was far superior to anything that had come before. But depravity and pride are powerful to deceive us into thinking that our opinion is right and all others should recognize it.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Science and sodomy


Here is a question for those who say that science has proven the existence of a sodomy gene. Let’s call it the S_gene. If what you say is true then this behavior should be considered natural and not a choice that bears personal responsibility. Therefore, those who hold to Biblical morality are wrong; the Biblical testimony is false. Christ died needlessly. We are all without hope in our sin. If there is no redemption for the sodomite, then there is no redemption for anyone.
 
So what does your science say about propagating the S_gene? What is there in nature to favor such a gene? Given that it did develop, what is there in nature to prevent it from extinction? The godless science to which you appeal to reject traditional morality and to justify this behavior demands that the S_gene has no reason to exist.

So which is it? How does your science find a gene that your science says can’t possibly exist? Genes do not propagate through dead in genetic paths. Your appeal to science is as much nonsense as your science.

Now there is a relationship between naturalism and sodomy, but not the one you think. The language of Romans 1 is explicit and unambiguous…

They did not like to retain God in their knowledge so God have them over to their lusts; first to immorality, then perversion and then to reprobation unless you repent and believe the gospel…

Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God’ [1 Corinthians 6:9-10].
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Darwinism is dying; make way for Panspermia

Extraterrestrial Enigma: Missing Amino Acids In Meteorites

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/11/031104064412.htm

ScienceDaily (Nov. 4, 2003) — Amino acids have been found in interstellar clouds and in meteorites – but with some enigmatic omissions and tantalizing similarities to life on Earth. Just why some amino acids are present in meteorites and others are absent, and why they seem to prefer the same "left-handed" molecular structure as Earth's living amino acids are questions that could unravel one of the most fundamental questions of science: Where and how did life begin?


"The bottom line is that you have these materials that come from space," says Steve Macko, professor of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville. Macko refers specifically to eight of the amino acids found in a certain kind of meteorite – a carbonaceous chondrite. All eight amino acids are identical to those used by life on Earth. That could seem to point to a cosmic origin of these basic biological building blocks, says Macko. The case is bolstered by the fact that early Earth was bombarded with meteorites and the amino acid glycine has been detected on interstellar molecular clouds.

[The presupposition of Mr. Macko is that meteorites with amino acids have an extraterrestrial origin. What is their most likely origin given that they contain bio chemicals?]

Making the case for cosmic origins of Earth's amino acids even more compelling is the fact that all of the meteorite amino acids, except glycine, favor the "left-handed" molecular structure…that is also favored by life on Earth. The preference for left-handed amino acids was a necessary precondition for life, but just why life chose left (L-amino acids) over right (D-amino acids) is a mystery.

[Life has a free will to choose L or R amino acids? Wouldn’t random processes demand equal amounts of L & R acids?]

"Essentially all of your protein is made of L-amino acids," said Macko. "Why is that? We don't know. The curious thing is that if you go to a meteorite you find a predominance of the same thing."

Another unanswered question: Why have only eight of life's 20 amino acids been found in meteorites? Perhaps all the amino acids were there, but something about the history of the meteorites or the analytical processes used limited their presence or their detection, Macko speculates.

Only in recent years has the idea of amino acids from space affecting the start of life on Earth become a plausible hypothesis, explains Macko. Initially, amino acids were thought to have been created in the primordial atmosphere of early Earth. In a now famous experiment more than a half-century ago, Stanley Miller and Harold Urey showed that amino acids were synthesized by simply creating lightning-like electrical discharges through a fog of water, methane and ammonia – all of which were thought to be readily available in Earth's early years. The experiment was proof that amino acids, out of which all life's proteins are made, can be created by strictly physical-chemical processes, without the help of living organisms.

[There it is…the theory of biogenesis is debunked. Did the experiment create life? If life happens spontaneously without design, then surely we can create it in a controlled experiment. Right?]

Perhaps the most famous carbonaceous chondrite was the Murchison meteorite, which fragmented and fell in 1969 in and around the small town of Murchison, Victoria, about 70 miles north of Melbourne, Australia. Amino acids and other organic molecules were found in the Murchison meteorite. The mix of amino acids found in the Murchison Meteorite was similar to those produced in Miller-Urey type experiments. A chief difference, however, was seen by Mike Engel in his PhD research: Unlike the Miller-Urey experiment which produced equal amounts of the D and L amino acids, Murchison tended to have L amino acids predominate. The fact that the meteorite was seen falling and fragments were collected quickly minimized the chances that they were contaminated by Earth amino acids.

The Miller-Urey experiment, combined with the discovery of amino acids in carbonaceous chondrites and the detection of glycine in molecular clouds, raise compelling issues about the origin of life on Earth, and its possible existence elsewhere in the solar system and beyond.

Adapted from materials provided by Geological Society Of America.

[Conclusions are dependent on our presuppositions. To compare these conclusions with that of a creationist world view see Walt Brown’s Origin of Comets, Asteroids and Meteoroids: http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook]
 
Tags: science  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Preachers of perversion


If enough people say that sexual perversion is OK, then who are we to say otherwise? The culture has already said that the murder of innocents is OK.

We point out that God has left us two examples of His judgment against sin for our instruction. It is not that we have not been warned, but that we do not believe the warnings.

For if God … did not spare the ancient world, but saved Noah, one of eight people, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood on the world of the ungodly; and turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes, condemned them to destruction, making them an example to those who afterward would live ungodly; and delivered righteous Lot, who was oppressed by the filthy conduct of the wicked … then the Lord knows how to deliver the godly out of temptations and to reserve the unjust under punishment for the day of judgment, and especially those who walk according to the flesh in the lust of uncleanness and despise authority’ [2 Peter 2:4-11].

The argument is not against the preachers of righteousness, but against the living God. Will the preachers of perversion convince God that He is bigoted and intolerant? Did Christ suffer needlessly for that which is not sin? God forbid! Will the creature question the Creator?But indeed, O man, who are you to reply against God?’ [Romans 9]
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Origins of Unbelief


The origins of life and the origins of the personal are always a problem for the atheist. With the advent of Darwin they justify their beliefs as science, which has become anti-science. Data is always interpreted to fit the theory; the pursuit of truth ends at protecting the theory. They have become what they disdain. With all the zeal of a religious fundamentalist they are the defenders of the faith of unbelief.

The darwinites remain resolute in their beliefs even though the mathematician tells them there is no probability that life arose by chance. The scientist has shown that life always comes from life. The philosopher tells them that it is impossible for the personal to come from the impersonal. The geneticist demonstrates that there are bounds to the variation within species. The paleontologist cannot find the expected multitude of undisputed transitional fossils. These things do not deter them in their faith.

How is it that men are so quick to believe nonsense and to hold it so arrogantly? We are told that a great many of the most intelligent accept their theory. How could so many be so wrong?

We must appeal to the theologian to answer. He reminds us that such blind faith is to be expected because of the plague of plagues that infects all men. The doctrine of depravity powers our unbelief. It drives the atheist to believe a lie even though he lives in a world that denies his profession of faith.

No one need teach us to resent the sovereignty of God over His creation to exercise His authority as He will. We share this enmity toward our Creator, and Darwinism fuels the enmity. At the cross is where men are reconciled to God and where this enmity is put to death.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (8) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Strategies of the Righteous


As an older man who married a younger woman the story of Boaz and Ruth has a tender place in the heart that is easier to feel than to speak of. I think Pastor John Piper has gotten to the heart of the matter in his sermon on Ruth 3…
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

If Baal is God


Elijah went before the people and said, "How long will you waver between two opinions? If the LORD is God, follow him; but if Baal is God, follow him." But the people said nothing. [1 kings 18:21]

The public schools have replaced Moses with Darwin. Rather than being taught the truth that they are image bearers of the God of creation, America’ young are indoctrinated with the vain philosophy that men are the product of the random and impersonal without design or purpose. Rather than unique in the creation of life as image bearers of the Creator, they are indoctrinated in the false religion that demeans them as nothing more than advanced apes.

Now when men are taught that they are descended from brute beasts and that there is no morality, then why do we expect to see them pursue self control?

Morality and self control are part of the natural law inherent in the heart of the image bearer. Abstinence education reinforces the natural law.

The power of Darwinism is that it helps to suppress the knowledge of God. It agrees with our natural enmity as God haters. Whereas knowledge of the Scriptures helps to restrain the enmity even among unbelievers, Darwinism feeds the enmity. The system is unstable.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Bible and the Constitution

 
'Does the conservative party put a priority on the Bible over the U.S. Constitution? Is it Bible first & Constitution second?' –TH classic
 

It is a common error in our day to separate the Bible from the Constitution. Without the Reformation and Great Awakening there would be no Constitution. We would still be under the tyranny of some king or pope. From the martyrs’ blood came the open Bible that freed men from the lawless church-states to pursue his dominion over the sciences, including the political science.

The framework of our Constitution includes the basic principles of representation and separation of powers. These things did not originate from the mind of men, but from revelation. The Bible is their origin.

Now the triumph of modern liberalism is that men think the Constitution stands alone. The eternal wisdom that inspired it is denied. So it has become subject to change based on the autonomous wisdom of men. Tyranny celebrates the death of liberty while the lawless think they are advocates of freedom.

In the book of the Law, Moses was instructed by the Lord God…

 “Choose wise, understanding, and knowledgeable men from among your tribes, and I will make them heads over you.’ [Deuteronomy 1:13]

The political principles of representative government were taken from this text and applied to the first written constitution in America dated 1638 in Connecticut…

1. The choice of public magistrates belongs unto the people by God’s own allowance.

2. The privilege of election which belongs unto the people must be exercised according to the blessed will and law of God.

3. Those that have power to appoint officers should also set the bounds of their authority.

Again we must look to the Scriptures…

'For the Lord is our judge, the Lord is our lawgiver, the Lord is our king…' [Isaiah 33:22]

In the New Testament Jesus Christ is called Judge and King and God the Lawgiver. Our forefathers understood that they were under the authority of God, and the Bible was their reference for truth to discover His will. They embodied these three divisions of power in the legislative, executive and judicial branches of government.

[Credits to Teaching & Learning America’s Christian History by Rosalie Slater]
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gospel Lessons from the Interpreter


The Faithful Pastor
from John Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress

http://acacia.pair.com/Acacia.John.Bunyan/Sermons.Allegories/Pilgrim.s.Progress/Pilgrim.Text/Part.One/10.html

Then he went on till he came at the house of the INTERPRETER, where he knocked over and over; at last one came to the door, and asked who was there?

Chr. Sir, here is a traveller, who was bidden by an acquaintance of the good man of the house to call here for my profit: I would therefore speak with the master of the house. So he called for the master of the house; who, after a little time, came to CHRISTIAN, and asked him what he would have?

Chr. "Sir," said CHRISTIAN, "I am a man that has come from the city of Destruction, and am going to the Mount Zion; and I was told by the man that stands at the gate at the head of this way, that if I called here you would show me excellent things, such as would be helpful to me in my journey."

Interpreter. Then said the INTERPRETER, "Come in; I will show thee that which will be profitable to thee." So he commanded his man to light the candle, and bade CHRISTIAN follow him: so he led him into a private room, and bade his man open a door; the which when he had done, CHRISTIAN saw the picture of a very grave person hung up against the wall; and this was the fashion of it: it had eyes lifted up to heaven, the best of books in his hand, the law of truth was written upon his lips, the world was behind his back; he stood as if he pleaded with men, and a crown of gold did hang over his head.

Chr. Then said CHRISTIAN, "What means this?"

Inter. The man whose picture this is, is one of a thousand: he can beget children;

"For though ye have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet have ye not many fathers: for in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel."
~ 1 Corinthians 4:15 ~


travail in birth with children;

"My little children, of whom I travail in birth again until Christ be formed in you,"
~ Galations 4:19 ~


and nurse them himself when they are born.

"I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able."
~ 1 Corinthians 3:2 ~


And whereas thou seest him with his eyes lifted up to heaven, the best of books in his hand, and the law of truth writ on his lips; it is to show thee that his work is to know and unfold dark things to sinners; even as also thou seest him stand as if he pleaded with men: and whereas thou seest the world as cast behind him, and that a crown hangs over his head; that is to show thee, that, slighting and despising the things that are present, for the love that he hath to his Master's service, he is sure in the world that comes next to have glory for his reward. Now, said the INTERPRETER, I have showed thee this picture first, because the man whose picture this is, is the only man whom the Lord of the place whither thou art going hath authorized to be thy guide in all difficult places thou mayest meet with in the way: wherefore, take good heed to what I have showed thee; and bear well in thy mind what thou hast seen, lest in thy journey thou meet with some that pretend to lead thee aright, but their way goes down to death.
 
Tags: Bunyan  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No other foundation but Christ

 
On the motivations of evangelicals, [Buckley] said, "They've figured out that our foundations need restoring, and I have never doubted that those foundations are religious."

Who are we to correct Mr. Buckley, but it was Bible believers that established the foundation of the American system, and it will be Bible believers who restore the foundations, if they are to be restored for there is no other foundation on which to build.

We resist the gradual tyranny of socialism, and seek nothing less than the return of the government to its proper role, that of securing our rights under natural law and the Constitution of life, liberty and property. The role of the state is to restrain the lawlessness of men and to leave the church unhindered.

Now we thank the poster for the quotes from Mr. Einstein because they make an important point. Based on reason alone even the most intelligent among us will never discover the wisdom of God…

In that hour Jesus rejoiced in the Spirit and said, “I thank You, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that You have hidden these things from the wise and prudent and revealed them to babes. Even so, Father, for so it seemed good in Your sight. [Luke 10:21]

In the Sermon on the Mount Jesus refers to His people as salt and light in the earth. The implication is clear; the world stands in a state of darkness and corruption. The tendency is always toward corruption in the spiritual as well as physical realms. ‘Light has come into the world, but men love darkness rather than light because their deeds are evil’ [John 3:19].

The increase of liberty among men has always followed the words of Jesus Christ where ever they have been faithfully proclaimed. There is no reason to think that liberty is beyond recovery if Christ is again faithfully preached in the churches of America.

Christ is victor over sin and death and comes offering liberty to those held captive. Our forefathers saw the truth of it and lived that way [Isaiah 61].

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE STATE AND FATE OF THE PROTESTANT RELIGION

 
 
The protestant religion may be considered either as it is religion in general, — that is, Christian religion; or as it is distinct from and opposite unto another pretended profession of the same religion, whereon it is called Protestant. In the first sense of it, it derives its original from Christ and his apostles. What they taught to be believed, what they commanded to be observed in the worship of God, — all of it, and nothing but that, — is the protestant religion. Nothing else belongs unto it; in nothing else is it concerned. These, therefore, are the principles of the religion of Protestants, where into their faith and obedience are resolved.

1. What was revealed unto the church by the Lord Christ and his apostles is the whole of that religion which God will and doth accept.

2. So far as is needful unto the faith, obedience, and eternal salvation of the church, what they taught, revealed, and commanded is contained in the Scriptures of the New Testament, witnessed unto and confirmed by those of the Old.

3. All that is required of us that we may please God, be accepted with him, and come to the eternal enjoyment of him, is, that we truly believe what is so revealed and taught, yielding sincere obedience unto what is commanded in the Scriptures.

Upon these principles Protestants confidently propose their religion unto the trial of all mankind. If in any thing it be found to deviate from them, — if it exceeds, in any instance, what is so revealed, taught, and commanded, — if it be defective in the faith or practice of any thing that is so revealed or commanded, — they are ready to renounce it. Here they live and die; from this foundation they will not depart: this is their religion.

And if these principles will not secure us, as unto our present acceptance with God in religion, and the eternal enjoyment of him, he hath left all mankind at an utter uncertainty, to make a blind venture for an invisible world; which is altogether inconsistent with his infinite wisdom, goodness, and benignity.

Being in possession of these principles of truth and security from Christ and his apostles, it belongs unto the protestant religion not to change or forego them, and to repose our confidence in the infallibility or authority of the pope of Rome, or of the church whereof he is the head. For these principles of assurance are such as every way become the wisdom and goodness of God; and such as that our nature is not capable in this life of those which are higher or of a more illustrious evidence. Let the contrary unto either of these be demonstrated, and we will renounce the protestant religion. To forego them for such as are irreconcilable unto divine wisdom and goodness, as also to the common reason of mankind, is an effect of the highest folly and of strong delusion.

For that all mankind should be obliged to place all their confidence and assurance of pleasing God, of living unto him, and coming unto the enjoyment of him for eternity, on the pope of Rome and his infallibility, however qualified and circumstantiated, considering what these popes are and have been, is eternally irreconcilable unto the greatness, wisdom, love, and kindness of God, as also unto the whole revelation made of himself by Jesus Christ.

The principles of protestant religion before mentioned do every way become, are highly suited unto, the nature and goodness of God, — no man living shall ever be able to instance in one tittle of them that is not correspondent with divine goodness and wisdom; — but on the first naming of this other way, no man who knows any thing what the pope is, and what is his church, if he be not blinded with prejudice and interest, will be able to satisfy himself that it is consistent with infinite goodness and wisdom to commit the salvation of mankind, which he values above all things, unto such a security.

Neither hath this latter way any better consistency with human wisdom or the common reason of mankind, — namely, that those who are known, many of them, to be better and wiser men than those popes, should resolve their religion, and therein their whole assurance of pleasing God, with all their hopes of a blessed eternity, into the authority and infallibility of the pope and his church, seeing many of them, the most of them, especially for some ages, have been persons wicked, ignorant, proud, sensual, and brutish in their lives.

This, then, is the foundation of the protestant religion, in that it is built on those principles which are every way suited unto the divine nature and goodness, as also satisfactory unto human reason, with a refusal of them which are unworthy of infinite wisdom to give, and the ordinary reason of men to admit or receive.

Secondly, as the name Protestant is distinctive with respect unto some other pretended profession of Christian religion, so it derives this denomination from them who in all ages, after the apostasy of the church of Rome came to be expressly antichristian, departed from the communion of it, opposed it, reformed themselves, and set up the true worship of God according unto the degrees and measures of gospel light which they had received.

This was done successively in a long tract of time, through sundry ages, until, by an accession of multitudes, princes and people, unto the same profession, they openly testified and protested against the papal apostasy and tyranny; whence they became to be commonly called Protestants.

And the principles whereon they all of them proceeded from first to last, which constitute their religion as protestant, were these that follow:

1. That there are in the Scripture, prophecies, predictions, and warnings, especially in the book of the Revelation and the Second Epistle of Paul the apostle to the Thessalonians, that there should be a great apostasy or defection in the visible church from the faith, worship, and holiness of the gospel; and, in opposition unto what was appointed of Christ, the [building] of a worldly, carnal, antichristian church-state, composed of tyranny, idolatry, and persecution, which should for a long time oppress the true worshippers of Christ with bloody cruelty, and at last be itself “consumed with the spirit of his mouth, and destroyed by the brightness of his coming.”

This defection was so plainly foretold, as also the beginning of it, in a “mystery of iniquity,” designed even in the days of the apostles, that believers in all ages did expect the accomplishment of it by the introduction of an antichristian state and power, though the manner of it was hidden from them, until it was really fulfilled. I say, from the days of the apostles, and the giving out of those prophecies and predictions of the coming of antichrist and an apostate church-state with him, all Christians in all ages did believe and expect that it should come, until its real coming, in a way and manner unexpected, confounded their apprehensions about it.

2. Their second principle as Protestants was, that this defection and antichristian church-state, so plainly foretold by the Holy Ghost in the Scriptures, was openly and visibly accomplished in the church of Rome, with the nations that had subjected themselves unto the yoke thereof. Therein they found and saw all that tyranny and oppression, all that pride and self-exaltation above every thing that hath the name of God upon it, all that idolatry and false worship, all that departure from the faith of the gospel, all that contempt of evangelical obedience, which were foretold to come in under and constitute the fatal apostasy.

3. Hereon their third principle was, that as they valued the glory of God, the honor of Christ and the gospel, their own salvation, and the good of the souls of others, they were obliged to forsake and renounce all communion with that apostate church, though they saw that their so doing would cost many of them their dearest blood or lives.

4. They were convinced, hereon, that it was their duty publicly to protest against all those abominations, to reform themselves, as unto faith, worship, and conversation, according unto the rules before laid down, as those that are fundamental unto Christian religion.

These were the principles whereon Christian religion, as it is protestant, was re-introduced into the world, after it had been not only obscured, but almost excluded out of it, as unto its public profession. And these principles are avowed by all true Protestants as those whereon they are ready at all times to put their cause and profession on the trial.

The way whereby the profession of this protestant religion was introduced on these principles, and made public in the world, under the antichristian apostasy, was the same whereby Christian religion entered the world under Paganism, — namely, by the prayers, preaching, writings, sufferings, and holiness of life of them who embraced it, and were called to promote it. And herein their sufferings, for the number of them that suffered, and variety of all cruel preparations of death, are inexpressible. It is capable of a full demonstration, that those who were slain by the sword and otherwise destroyed for their testimony unto Christ and the gospel, in opposition unto the papal apostasy and idolatry, did far exceed the number of them that suffered for the Christian religion in all the pagan persecutions of old. A plant so soaked and watered with the blood of the martyrs will not be so easily plucked up as some imagine. Nay, it is probable it will not go out without more blood (of sufferers, I mean) than it was introduced by; which yet no man knows how to conceive or express.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive