About Me

Name: ValiantForTruth
Location: Burleson, TX
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

White House Repeals Conscience Protection

 
President Obama has announced that he will rescind the conscience protection for medical workers that currently provides them legal protection for refusing to violate their conscience by participating in abortions.

The Bible makes the rights of conscience a repeated subject of emphasis. It is sin to wound the conscience of another. Christians are instructed to respect the rights of conscience in things indifferent [I Corinthians 8:9-13].

The rights of conscience have long been a cherished characteristic of the American civil fabric, and America's Framers openly praised these protections:

No provision in our Constitution ought to be dearer to man than that which protects the rights of conscience. THOMAS JEFFERSON, SIGNER OF THE DECLARATION

Consciences of men are not the objects of human legislation. WILLIAM LIVINGSTON, SIGNER OF THE CONSTITUTION

Security under our Constitution is given to the rights of conscience. JOHN JAY, ORIGINAL CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE U. S. SUPREME COURT

Government is instituted to protect property of every sort. . . . [and] conscience is the most sacred of all property. JAMES MADISON, SIGNER OF THE CONSTITUTION


Today, the safeguards for the rights of conscience now appear in forty-seven state constitutions. The President's decision to rescind these protections places him in direct opposition to four centuries of America's civic and religious leaders.

Protection for the rights of conscience is just one more reason that Biblical Christianity is so beneficial to a culture and why its principles must be preserved in public policy. [David Barton]

http://www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=23592
[a historical perspective exposing Obama’s lawlessness by David Barton]
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (8) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Loss of Purpose Begets Lawlessness

 
Could it be any clearer that government may not prohibit "the free exercise thereof"? –Chuck Norris
 

 
The Constitution and the Bill of Rights are only clear in the context of their origin. The consensus from Biblical Christianity that rights are derived from the commands of the sovereign God and Creator of all things has been lost to a godless and vain philosophy that all that exists is self created and self sustained without design and therefore without purpose.

That’s the part that is lost in the intelligent design debate: Design implies purpose. When design is suppressed, then purpose has no meaning and every man becomes a law unto himself.

What is the purpose of man? The old catechism says it best: The chief end of man is to love God and to enjoy Him forever. He has given us the Law and the Gospel that we might find our purpose.

When men suppress this truth and give up the Christian world view, then rights also lose their meaning. No longer are they derived from the self-revealed God giving them a reference to the absolute, but they become arbitrary as derived from the autonomous reason of man.

The rule of law is meaningless to the culture of lawlessness, personified in Obamanomics.

Conservatives are rightly concerned over the devastation that follows the policies of socialism, but those who love liberty should focus on the vain philosophy that undermines the truth from which liberty has its origin.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »