Posted by
ValiantForTruth on Wednesday, December 29, 2010 10:06:36 AM
Arrows indicate redshift.
Absorption lines in the optical spectrum of a supercluster of distant galaxies (right),
as compared to absorption lines in the optical spectrum of the Sun (left).
Wavelength increases up towards the red.
The observed redshift value of any object is made up of two components: the inherent component and the velocity component. The velocity component is the only one recognized by mainstream astronomers. The inherent redshift is a property of the matter in the object. It apparently changes over time in discrete steps. Arp suggests that quasars are typically emitted from their parent galaxies with inherent redshift values of up to z = 2. They continue to move away, with stepwise decreasing inherent redshift. Often, when the inherent redshift value gets down to around z = 0.3, the quasar starts to look like a small galaxy…and begins to fall back, with still decreasing redshift values, toward its parent. There are many such family groupings. Any additional redshift (over and above its inherent value) is indeed indicative of the object's velocity. But the inherent part is an indication of the object's youth and usually makes up the larger fraction of a quasar's total redshift.
[Note the revolutionary statement that inherent redshift is an indication of the object’s age. Question: Why would the darwinites not be in full support behind this discovery?]
In addition, these inherent redshift z values of quasars seem to be quantized! The very existence of this quantization alone, is sufficient proof of the failure of the idea that redshift is only an indicator of recessional speed. This quantization means (under the redshift equals distance interpretation) that quasars all must lie in a series of concentric shells with Earth at the center of the entire arrangement.
[Answer: A center of the universe is anathema to the big bang theory since it assumes a universe of uniform density with no boundaries. It cannot have a center of mass nor a center of rotation.]
Beware the darwinite deception and fraudulent claims. The raw measured total redshift values of the universal set of all known quasars are not quantized. It is the inherent redshift z values that are!
Instead of recognizing Arp for his work and reexamining their assumption that "redshift equals distance", he continues to be systematically denied publication of his results and refused telescope time. One would at least expect the "powers that be" to immediately turn the Chandra X-ray orbiting telescope, the Hubble space telescope, and all the big land based telescopes toward Arp's exciting discoveries in order to either confirm or disprove them once and for all. Instead, these objects have been completely excluded from examination. Official photographs are routinely cropped to exclude them. Those familiar with the Galileo story will remember the high priests of orthodoxy who refused to look through his telescope.
How can a Quasar be in Front of a Nearby Galaxy?
Another irrefutable falsification of the "Redshift equals distance" assumption is the following image of galaxy NGC 7319 (Redshift = 0.0225). The small object indicated by the arrow is a quasar (Redshift z = 2.11). This observation of a quasar between the galaxy and Earth is impossible if the quasar is over ninety times farther away than the galaxy.
Therefore, quasars are not the brightest, most distant and rapidly moving things in the observed universe, but they are among the youngest. The Big Bang Theory is false because it has been scientifically falsified. Halton Arp is now at the Max Planck Institute in Germany.
[What does it mean that high redshifted quasars are young and that inherent redshift is a measure of age? What does it mean that quasars have parent galaxies? These are the interesting questions being pursued by today’s scientists. Meanwhile the darwinites are doing all they can to suppress these advancements in science by defending their obsolete and dying theories.]
For some interesting non-orthodox views from scientists who deal with the evidence and recognize the anomalies and who are NOT creationists: http://www.electric-cosmos.org/indexOLD.htm