Posted by
ValiantForTruth on Thursday, September 02, 2010 11:51:24 AM
The Big Bang was the result of the inevitable laws of physics and did not need God to spark the creation of the Universe, Stephen Hawking has concluded.
But Mr. Hawking what is your explanation for the existence of the ‘inevitable laws of physics’?
The scientist has claimed that no divine force was needed to explain why the Universe was formed.
OK, why was the universe formed? What is the purpose of our existence? Or is the universe and life on earth without design and purpose?
In his latest book, The Grand Design, an extract of which is published in Eureka magazine in The Times, Hawking said: “Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist.”
Spontaneous creation from nothing except ‘a law such as gravity’. Is the law of gravity eternal? Where did it come from? Can you even explain what it is?
He added: “It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going.”
Neo-science doesn’t need God to explain anything. It is capable of its own miracles.
In A Brief History of Time, Prof Hawking's most famous work, he did not dismiss the possibility that God had a hand in the creation of the world. He wrote in the 1988 book: "If we discover a complete theory, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason — for then we should know the mind of God.”
No! You would be doing what Newton and the early scientists said, that is, discovering God’s thoughts after Him. We can only know the mind of God in what He has revealed in creation and in Jesus Christ.
In his new book he rejects Sir Isaac Newton's theory that the Universe did not spontaneously begin to form but was set in motion by God.
Newton had an answer for why scientific law exists and can be discovered by man. Hawking is a neo-scientist that has confused his radical naturalism for science.
In June this year Prof Hawking told a Channel 4 series that he didn't believe that a "personal" God existed. He told Genius of Britain: "The question is: is the way the universe began chosen by God for reasons we can't understand, or was it determined by a law of science? I believe the second. If you like, you can call the laws of science 'God', but it wouldn't be a personal God that you could meet, and ask questions."
An outright rejection of Jesus Christ who said, “He who has seen Me has seen the Father” [John 14:9].
Until his retirement last year Prof Hawking was Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge, a post previously held by Newton.
This is classic fulfillment of the Romans 1 that when men suppress the knowledge of God, they are given over to a debased mind. The fruits of neo-science have resulted in intelligent men believing in ‘spontaneous creation’ from nothing. This should remind us of the idea of spontaneous generation as an explanation for the origin of life.
Which is the greatest miracle: spontaneous creation or God spoke and it was done as recorded in Genesis 1? Hawking keeps looking for a unifying theory of everything, yet he has no understanding of the most basic things. Who is God and what is His purpose in creation? Who is man and what is the purpose of his life? Neo-science is a dead end ideology that leads men to destruction; it has no answers to our biggest questions. Its appeal is its agreement with our natural enmity towards God.