Posted by
ValiantForTruth on Friday, March 28, 2008 8:46:53 AM
Here is a question for those who say that science has proven the existence of a sodomy gene. Let’s call it the S_gene. If what you say is true then this behavior should be considered natural and not a choice that bears personal responsibility. Therefore, those who hold to Biblical morality are wrong; the Biblical testimony is false. Christ died needlessly. We are all without hope in our sin. If there is no redemption for the sodomite, then there is no redemption for anyone.
So what does your science say about propagating the S_gene? What is there in nature to favor such a gene? Given that it did develop, what is there in nature to prevent it from extinction? The godless science to which you appeal to reject traditional morality and to justify this behavior demands that the S_gene has no reason to exist.
So which is it? How does your science find a gene that your science says can’t possibly exist? Genes do not propagate through dead in genetic paths. Your appeal to science is as much nonsense as your science.
Now there is a relationship between naturalism and sodomy, but not the one you think. The language of Romans 1 is explicit and unambiguous…
They did not like to retain God in their knowledge so God have them over to their lusts; first to immorality, then perversion and then to reprobation unless you repent and believe the gospel…
‘Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God’ [1 Corinthians 6:9-10].